Strategy or Identity? An Analysis of the Adoption and Implementation of Voter Suppression by the Republican Party

dc.contributorSmith, Preston
dc.contributorTucker, Kenneth
dc.contributor.advisorHilton, Adam
dc.contributor.authorMurray, Kate
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-06T13:02:00Z
dc.date.available2022-06-06T13:02:00Z
dc.date.gradyear2022en_US
dc.date.issued2022-06-06
dc.description.abstractDemocracy has been considered to be at the core of the American ethos since the country’s founding, though the privilege of civic participation has never been equally accessible. In particular, large populations in the United States have been denied the right to vote throughout history, keeping power concentrated in the hands of a select few. The phenomenon of voter suppression has especially skyrocketed since the 2020 presidential election, and these efforts have been overwhelmingly spearheaded by the Republican party. This research explores the factors motivating contemporary voter suppression efforts as well as the effects and distribution of voter suppression legislation. Drawing on theories of party development and ideology, I propose the “party identity hypothesis:” that the support for voter suppression by the Republican party is not merely a strategy to win elections, but rather an adoption of the practice as a key element of the party’s identity. To test this hypothesis, I have created a voter suppression index tool to measure the degree of voter suppression in all 50 states. The data are then analyzed using a multiple linear regression model to determine whether index scores are significantly correlated with significant degrees of electoral competition and percentages of people of color, as the existing literature suggests. I find that the only variable significantly correlated with suppressive outcomes is party affiliation, suggesting that the Republican party has motives to suppress beyond winning elections. To further support the party identity hypothesis, I identify two case studies of Republican states where voter suppression is present without significant degrees of electoral competition or large communities of color. I conclude with implications and limitations of the study as well as areas of future research that could expand the contributions of this study.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipPoliticsen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10166/6343
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rights.restrictedpublicen_US
dc.subjectVotingen_US
dc.subjectVoter Suppressionen_US
dc.subjectAmerican Politicsen_US
dc.subjectRepublican Partyen_US
dc.titleStrategy or Identity? An Analysis of the Adoption and Implementation of Voter Suppression by the Republican Partyen_US
dc.typeThesis
mhc.degreeUndergraduateen_US
mhc.institutionMount Holyoke College

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Kate Murray- Thesis FINAL.docx.pdf
Size:
634.5 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: