Being Realistic About Reducing Incarceration: Political Approaches to Incarceration Reform in Michigan, What Works, and What Does Not

dc.contributorWuest, Joanna
dc.contributor.advisorSmith II, Preston
dc.contributor.authorWadhwani, Avni
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-14T16:37:45Z
dc.date.available2023-07-14T16:37:45Z
dc.date.gradyear2023en_US
dc.date.issued2023-07-14EN
dc.description.abstractMichelle Alexander’s The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness took the criminal justice space by storm. Published in 2010 just as states began reversing War on Drugs policies, the book transformed the way activists and policymakers think about prison and the state’s role in incarceration. The book’s core premise posited that incarceration’s purpose is to systematically and intentionally disenfranchise African American men. My research challenges the dominance of Alexander’s narrative on the carceral system and aims to answer the question: what is the most effective political approach to getting criminal justice reform policy passed that significantly reduces the incarcerated population given existing political conditions in Michigan and other states with similar conditions? My research draws on interviews with state policymakers and activists, political messaging in newspaper articles, press releases, and legislative hearings, and successful and unsuccessful legislation passed in Michigan’s 100th and 101st state legislative sessions to create a comprehensive analysis of when and where certain political approaches succeed and fail. I argue that Alexander’s “race approach” is not the most effective political approach to reducing incarceration on a messaging or policy basis. I argue instead for the success of the “economic approach” in passing reform legislation. This economic approach aims to ameliorate the effects of the carceral system, both by making it easier for offenders to access socioeconomic resources after incarceration and through preventative but piecemeal measures before incarceration, such as increasing funding for an individual program or resource. I argue that while the economic approach has achieved the most success from a messaging and policy standpoint thus far, mass redistribution into working- and middle-class communities is needed to truly shrink the carceral state. This thesis categorizes and measures different political approaches to carceral reform, which previous scholars have not done, and creates a political framework for how legislators in purple states can get reform legislation passed.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipPoliticsen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10166/6454
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rights.restrictedrestricteden_US
dc.subjectincarcerationen_US
dc.subjectraceen_US
dc.subjectclassen_US
dc.subjectpolitical messagingen_US
dc.subjectreformen_US
dc.subjectincarceration reformen_US
dc.subjectcrimeen_US
dc.subjectblack lives matteren_US
dc.subjectprisonen_US
dc.subjectactivismen_US
dc.subjectstate policymakersen_US
dc.subjectpolicymakersen_US
dc.subjectMichiganen_US
dc.subjectpurple stateen_US
dc.subjectpolitical approachen_US
dc.titleBeing Realistic About Reducing Incarceration: Political Approaches to Incarceration Reform in Michigan, What Works, and What Does Noten_US
dc.typeThesis
mhc.degreeUndergraduateen_US
mhc.institutionMount Holyoke College

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
AvniWadhwani_ThesisFinalDraft_Archived.pdf
Size:
6.69 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: