Show simple item record

dc.contributorKebbede, Girma
dc.contributor.advisorReiter, Andrew G.
dc.contributor.advisorRemmler, Karen
dc.contributor.authorRogers, Kelsey
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-01T22:46:56Z
dc.date.available2013-07-01T22:46:56Z
dc.date.issued2013-07-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10166/3281
dc.description.abstractIn 1994, the genocide in Rwanda killed over 500,000 Tutsi and moderate Hutu citizens in approximately 100 days. The extent and brutality of the violence affected nearly every Rwandan. In the aftermath, civil society and the current government have pushed for opportunities to commemorate the victims of the genocide and tell their narratives through physical spaces. There are now many memorials throughout the country ranging from large museums featuring physical evidence and panels of information geared towards international tourists to small community cemeteries. Yet scholars question the rationales behind the construction of specific spaces, the narratives they support or refute, and the effects that they may have on those who view them. In particular, many have focused on the contentious debate over the display of human remains in these memorial spaces. However, scholars have not yet viewed memorialization as a whole, overlooking the important variation between local and national spaces to answer these questions. In this project, I collect data on 54 diverse memorial spaces in Rwanda, searching for variation in the construction and use of the space, and specifically whether human remains were present. I then conduct four detailed case studies; one national memorial that uses confrontational displays of bones, two local memorials that commemorate the genocide without using human remains, and one memorial that illustrates a fascinating hybrid strategy, following neither the pattern of local, nor national, memorialization. My analysis finds that there is an apparent and significant divide between local and national memorials. This divide is most apparent when examining human remains; I argue that this strategy clearly exemplifies a conscious political decision to manipulate visitors (namely foreign tourists) to accept the dominant government narrative of genocide history. This gap between local and national memorialization and the subsequent use of human remains in the latter category may greatly affect reconciliation and ethnic identities as Rwandans must come to terms with their past, and how they choose to commemorate it for future generations.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipInternational Relationsen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectRwandaen_US
dc.subjectgenocideen_US
dc.subjecttransitional justiceen_US
dc.subjectmemorialsen_US
dc.subjectmemorializationen_US
dc.subjectreconciliationen_US
dc.titleRemains of Genocide: The Impact of Objects in Negotiating Politically Sensitive Memorial Spaces in Rwandaen_US
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.gradyear2013en_US
mhc.institutionMount Holyoke College
mhc.degreeUndergraduateen_US
dc.rights.restrictedrestricteden_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record